''They have no right to be spying on members of the public.'': Vanessa Powell.
''They have no right to be spying on members of the public.'': Vanessa Powell. Photo: Kate Ausburn







Federal government departments are using increasingly
powerful cyber-snooping equipment to monitor the social media lives of
millions of Australians.



A dramatic public confrontation between the Immigration
Department and a Sydney-based political activist over her Facebook page
has resulted in accusations that mass surveillance is being used to keep
tabs on political dissent.



Other large government departments including Centrelink,
Defence and Social Services have all conducted mass monitoring of social
media activity.



Centrelink's parent agency, the Department of Human
Services, even has its own software, which was developed by the CSIRO. A
social media team of 10 public servants operates the software.




The Department of Immigration and Border Protection hires
private sector contractors who can monitor more than half-a-billion
''pieces'' of social media each day on sites such as Facebook, Twitter,
YouTube, Pinterest and Flickr.



Immigration experimented several years ago with powerful
software called Radian 6, which can provide surveillance across a range
of social web platforms, but decided not to adopt it.



The department's key research contractor has told Fairfax
that the monitoring currently undertaken for Immigration was about
''taking the temperature of society'' and that no reputable research
company would help government departments compile ''hit lists'' of
political opponents.



But pro-asylum seeker campaigner Vanessa Powell said she was
intimidated when the department tweeted her about an ''offensive
remark'' it said should be removed from her Facebook thread immediately
or the government would ''consider our options further''.



''I felt quite intimidated and threatened as well because I
didn't know what action they were referring to when they said, 'We will
consider our options further','' Ms Powell told Fairfax.



When she identified the post in question - a comment using
''foul language'' a friend had made about a photograph of a protest at a
Sydney detention centre - she removed it.



''I was shocked that they were actively monitoring my account because it's just my personal page,'' the activist said.



''They have no right to be spying on members of the public.''



The secretive department refused to say how it became aware of the material on Ms Powell's Facebook account.



The department said it had no problem with ''discourse'' on
politics or policies; it confronted Ms Powell over an ''offensive''
remark about one of its public servants.



Immigration said it would be ''inappropriate'' to disclose
publicly how it became aware of Ms Powell's post but pointed out that
the material was open to public viewing.



Written questions from Fairfax to Immigration about its
social media monitoring were referred to the office of Immigration
Minister Scott Morrison, which did not respond.